Nothing in science is true until it has been experimented many many times and worked out the way it should each time. This is why I think to make science more interesting you would need to make science based off theory, facts, and based off prior knowledge or as I like to refer it as past, present, future.
Science is all off of theory in my opinion. Nothing in science is is true until it has been proven many times and is accepted as fact. Some examples of proven science fact are Newtons law of gravity, The particle theory of matter, and Newtons law of Physics. Proving something in science is not a just a few experiments with you and your friends, your theory will only be accepted as fact when the whole world knows about your theory and it has been experimented many times throughout the globe. Accepted facts are known as Scientific Theories. As you might know I enjoy theory a lot. As my last blog post was based on averages and theory. It is a theory because it hasn't been proven yet or it hasn't been experimented.
Facts are another component to science. Using the facts we already know, we can come up with new theories creating more opportunities at discovering something new. Facts can help us with learning the truth and future technology or inventions. Future inventions will make our lives easier therefore causing that first theory to become the next television or the next "eco-friendly-super-fast-car". But theories don't only apply for technology, they can apply for medical uses (the cure for cancer).
Prior knowledge is how we get our "theory topic" I guess you could say. To find the "theory topic" you would need prior knowledge as to what we need in our lives to make them easier, to find a cure for a disease, With our theory topic we can discus the details and how we could make the theory true or make it slightly more viable.
This is why I think you can make science more valuable and more interesting by making science more theoretical and based off the true facts we already have.
